There are two options for text handling in Noda Time. For some elements of
formatting, you can follow the "normal" approach from the .NET Base Class
Library (BCL) - in particular, most of the core Noda Time types implements
IFormattable. However, no parsing support is provided in this way. (It used
to be, but the whole approach is so convoluted that documenting it accurately
proved too great an overhead.)
The preferred approach is to use the "pattern" classes such as
and so forth. This leads to clearer, more robust code, and performs better. The formatting
support present in the BCL style is mostly present to work well with compound format strings,
where you may wish to mix several values of different types in a single formatting call.
All the types responsible for text in Noda Time are in the NodaTime.Text namespace.
A pattern is an object capable of parsing from text to a specific
type, and formatting a value to text. Parsing and formatting don't
take any other options: the pattern knows everything about how to
map between the value and text. In particular, internationalization
is handled by having the pattern hold a
Whereas using the BCL approach the format information has to be specified on every call, using the pattern approach the format information is fixed for any particular pattern. Convenience methods are provided to create new pattern instances based on existing ones but with different internationalization information or other options.
Each core Noda type has its own pattern type such as
these patterns implement the
which has simple
Parse methods taking just the value
and text respectively. The result of
Parse is a
encapsulates both success and failure results.
ToString(): Formats the value using the default pattern for the current thread's format provider.
ToString(string, IFormatProvider): Formats the value with the given pattern and format provider. The pattern text for this call is exactly the same as when creating a pattern object with the preferred API.
Each type has its own separate pattern text documentation. The available patterns are as consistent as possible within reason, but documenting each separately avoids confusion with some field specifiers being available for some types but not others.
Standard patterns are those denoted with a single character to represent a common pattern within the culture
being used. For example, the standard pattern
d for a
LocalDate is in month/day/year format in a US culture,
but day/month/year format in a UK culture. They're usually a shorthand for a possibly-culture-specific custom format,
but not always. (Some standard patterns in Noda Time can't be represented directly in custom patterns.)
Custom patterns give more direct control over how a value is formatted or parsed. It may
still be culture-sensitive like standard patterns, but in a lower level way - the
/ format specifier within a
LocalDate pattern is used to indicate
the culture-sensitive date separator, which is
/ in a US culture but
. in German culture, for example.
When a single character is specified for a pattern, it is always treated as a standard pattern. If no standard
pattern for that character exists, an exception is thrown. To create a custom pattern which would normally only
contain a single character, use
% to effectively "escape" the character. So a
LocalTime custom pattern which
formats the 24-hour hour-of-day without padding would be represented as
All custom patterns support the following characters:
||Escape to force a single-character custom pattern to be treated as such.||
||Open and close a text literal, which can include double quotes.||
||Open and close a text literal, which can include single quotes.||
||Escapes the following character.||
:always refers to the culture-specific time separator (a colon in the invariant culture)
/always refers to the culture-specific date separator (a forward slash in the invariant culture)
Any characters within a custom format which don't have a specific meaning are treated as text literals (when parsing, they must be matched exactly; when formatting they are reproduced exactly). This is supported mostly for the sake of compatibility. We strongly recommend that you quote any text literals, to avoid nasty surprises if extra characters take on special meanings in later versions.